Playbook · October 11, 2026
Private equity: from the first-look LBO to quarter-end monitoring
Miguel Casares · Co-founder & CEO
A private equity deal lives through several models. A first-look LBO decides whether to spend time on it. An underwriting model decides the price. After closing, the same company is monitored quarter by quarter against the plan that justified it. In most firms these are different files built by different people, and the link between what was underwritten and what is happening is rebuilt by hand every quarter.
This playbook describes how a deal team runs the life of an investment in Aqmen. Four properties hold: every return traces to the assumption behind it; base, management and downside cases sit side by side; when the quarter lands the models refresh; and every figure in the IC deck traces to its cell.
Set up
Each deal is a project in the firm's workspace, its investment thesis and open questions in the project notes. Collections hold the LBO, the underwriting model, the diligence inputs and the IC materials. Diligence outputs (a market model, an advisor's report, a quality-of-earnings schedule) are sources or datasets the models read, cited.
Workstream 1: the first-look LBO
Entry, debt, exit and returns are built in your template, in a spreadsheet connected to the target's financials as datasets. The structure is the familiar one: sources and uses, the debt schedule by tranche, cash sweep, exit, and the returns bridge.
Private equity
Returns, base case
| Entry | Exit · year 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| EBITDA · €m | 42 | 68 |
| Multiple | 11.0x | 11.0x |
| Net debt · €m | (250) | (96) |
| Equity · €m | 212 | 652 |
- 3.1x
- money multiple
- 25%
- IRR
- 5.9x
- leverage at entry
What changes is how the cases and sensitivities are held:
- Cases are named assumptions. Base, management and downside are sets of assumptions on one model, not three files. Each can be explained by listing what it changes.
- Sensitivities are a table, not a copied tab. Entry multiple against exit multiple, leverage against margin: each grid is computed from the same model.
- Checks show the model closes. Sources equal uses, the debt schedule balances, cash flows bridge to net debt.
Workstream 2: the underwriting model
The full model is built from bottom-up schedules (revenue by product and channel, headcount, capex, working capital) in the firm's standard, connected to the data. The management plan is one case among others, so where it departs from the base case is a list of named assumptions, not a feeling.
If the diligence included a market model, the underwriting model reads it. The plan's growth is held against the market's, and what outruns the market is visible: a plan that assumes 14% a year in a market growing at 5.7% is a plan that depends on share, and the IC should see that on one line.
Review notes from the investment committee become named assumptions with a reason and an author, not overwritten cells. Your assistant can apply a case or a review note over MCP and report what it changed in the returns.
Workstream 3: portfolio monitoring
After closing, each company's model stays in the workspace. When the quarter's actuals land, they are appended to the company's datasets, and the models that read them refresh. Nobody re-keys the monitoring pack.
Portfolio · third quarter
Against plan, this quarter
| Revenue | EBITDA | Leverage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha | +4% | +2% | 3.1x |
| Beta | −6% | −11% | 4.8x |
| Gamma | +1% | +3% | 2.2x |
| Delta | +9% | +6% | 3.6x |
- Actuals appended, models refreshed. Revenue, EBITDA and leverage against plan come from the same model that underwrote the deal.
- One page per portfolio question. Covenant headroom, plan variance, cash conversion: each a focused view across the companies.
- Conclusions re-checked as numbers move. The findings written last quarter (that a company was on plan, that leverage was falling) are flagged when the new actuals put them in question.
One honest limit: portfolio monitoring happens inside one workspace. Companies tracked together live in the same workspace; Aqmen does not consolidate across workspaces.
The IC deck
The IC deck is a deck built in Aqmen: the cases, the returns bridge and the sensitivities, each chart added by source from the model. If an assumption changes the day before the committee, the slides that depend on it are flagged. The deck exports editable, in your house style.
Where did that number come from?
Every return walks back: the IRR to the exit equity, the exit equity to the EBITDA and multiple assumed, the EBITDA to the schedule that built it, and the schedule to its data and sources. The method that derived each figure is stored with it, a confidence is stated where an input is a proxy or an estimate, and before a source is replaced you can see everything it touches. Two years later, at exit, the question "what did we underwrite?" has an exact answer.
Hand over the workspace, not a file
The IC deck and the monitoring pack still come out as files. Co-investors, lenders or the portfolio company's management can also join the workspace as guests: read the pages and the models, see every source, and ask the next question through their own assistant, from the same data.
Chat, workbook or workspace
| A chat | A spreadsheet agent | Aqmen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The financials | Pasted in, gone after | In the workbook, from wherever | Datasets with their sources, appended each quarter |
| A return's origin | In the transcript | In a cell comment | Assumption, schedule and source, on the record |
| A case | Ask again | A copied file | A named scenario on the same model |
| When the quarter lands | Ask again | Re-key the pack | Models refresh; conclusions are re-checked |
| Next deal | From zero | From the last file | From everything already there |
What it runs on
Aqmen works inside the assistant your team already uses (Claude, ChatGPT or any MCP-capable assistant). The step-by-step practice is in the open Aqmen skills. Models, documents and decks export editable. The workspace is private to your firm and never used to train models.
To see your LBO template and a quarter of monitoring run this way, talk to our team.